Wednesday 30 November 2011

Review: With Tablet S, I Worry About Sony



Sony’s Tablet S is an awkward device, but not because of its unusual wedge-shaped design. It is awkward because it catches Sony in the middle of a transition, from an iconic hardware maker to an Apple-like company that sells software, services and the devices to run it all. After playing with a Tablet S for review, it’s clear that Sony’s growth spurt isn’t anywhere near finished.
Because of the hardware, the Tablet S remains interesting among a sea of me-too Android tablets. Yes, the wedge shape looks weird next to every iPad imitator on the market, but Sony’s goal of making a tablet that feels like a magazine, folded over, is a success. When holding the tablet upright, an instinct takes over that makes me want to read things. It’s too bad Android Honeycomb is tailored toward landscape orientation, with some apps such as the Android Market only displaying horizontally. In that orientation, the Tablet S is less comfortable in the hands, but not unbearably so. The 9.4-inch display is roomy enough, while feeling less cumbersome than 10.1-inch widescreen tablets.
The Tablet S also hides a neat trick in the form of a built-in infrared remote control, which can operate pretty much anything in your living room. The tablet recognized my two year-old Sharp HDTV right away, and I was able to program volume controls on my decades-old Sony stereo system manually.
Just one hardware nitpick: unless you want to wake up to a blinking notification light in the middle of the night, you’ll have to disable notifications altogether on the Tablet S. There’s no way to turn off the light otherwise.
Hardware is only as good as the software it runs, and that’s where the Tablet S starts to degrade. Android Honeycomb lets you do some cool stuff, such as adding widgets to the home screen, but its slowly-growing tablet app library doesn’t compare with that of Apple’s iPad. The OS occasionally stutters when moving from one screen to the next, and it has some frustrating bugs, like when an app you acquire from the Android Market hangs in “waiting to install” limbo. Sony’s added a few of its own flourishes, such as a stylized “Favorite Apps” menu, and claims to have made the software run smoother and faster than other Android tablets, but these tweaks don’t amount to a major improvement over the stock version of Android, which itself still needs work.
Where Sony really tries to stand out is in services, which is tech jargon for “giving you stuff to consume on your device.” For a long time, Sony’s been trying to create a platform for music, movies, books and games, with the end goal of having all that content available on every screen you own. The Tablet S could be a piece of that puzzle, if only its services were enticing.

The Great Tablet Debate: Fads or Here to Stay?



What is a tablet and who needs one anyway? Are tablets a fad and will they soon fade into irrelevance like Netbooks? Will tablets replace traditional PCs? Is there a tablet market or just an iPad market? I hear there and other questions raised from industry executives as well as many in the media on a regular basis. There are a range of opinions all over the place on this great tablet debate and I hope to add some perspective to the conversation below.
This Market is Very Early
My firm’s analysis of the market suggests that the overall tablet industry is growing at a rapid pace. We estimate just over 50 million tablets will be sold in calendar 2011 and around 100 million in 2012. We, at Creative Strategies, Inc., believe that the majority of those will be iPads and there are some key reasons why.
The first can be attributed to the early market momentum of the iPad. When we look historically at how products get adopted, history generally favors the market leader. As products mature and consumers are experiencing ownership with a new product category, they generally go with the safe bet, and right now that’s the iPad. The iPad is by far the best general purpose tablet on the market and at the moment it commands the most consumer mindshare when considering a tablet purchase.
However, the tablet is a maturing category. This is a very important point to understand. Although technology products overall are being adopted more rapidly in mature markets, the products themselves still go through their own maturity process.  Tablets are no exception, which is why many consumers will look back at these early days and think of the iPad as the first tablet computer.
But a new wrinkle in the debate that’s come to light recently relates to the Amazon Kindle Fire and Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet. Both of these products have been reviewed in view of the iPad, which is the wrong approach. In reality, the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablets are interesting to the market because they’re not trying to compete with the iPad. Rather, both take a more specific use case approach. What I mean by this, is that the Fire and Nook Tablet were built with things like e-reading, and content consumption in mind.
The root of this understanding comes from one of the best technology industry books ever written by Clayton Christensen called “The Innovator’s Dilemma.” In this book, Professor Christensen brilliantly explains how consumers “hire” products to get jobs done. That job can be writing, reading, producing, creating, etc., but the point is that there are tasks and jobs to be done that products fulfill. The Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet were built for specific jobs, whereas the iPad was built to be more general purpose, similar to a PC.
As this market matures and the tablet category evolves, consumers will refine for themselves which jobs a tablet fulfills. In that process the role of the tablet in consumers’ lives will flesh itself out. I don’t believe tablets are a fad and will find a very important role in the life of the global consumer.



Tuesday 29 November 2011

Up in Smoke: iPhone Glows Red on Plane, Melts



Where there’s smoke, there’s…if not exactly fire, how about a glowing red iPhone on an airplane? No really, someone’s iPhone apparently turned the color of molten rock (aka “lava”) and began venting “dense smoke” on an Australian regional airline last week, prompting a flight attendant to break out the cabin’s fire extinguisher.
The airline, Regional Express (Rex), acknowledged the event in a story last Friday. The flight, ZL319, was traveling from Lismore to Sydney, and had just landed when the iPhone began “emitting a significant amount of dense smoke, accompanied by a red glow.” It was so hot, reports Australia’s Herald Sun, that it “had to be dropped to the floor of the cabin,” and it “partially melted and had to be doused by a flight attendant with a fire extinguisher.”
Rex’s media release refers to the event as “mobile phone self combustion,” but says no one onboard was harmed and that it’s referred the incident to the Australian Transport Safety Bureau (ATSB) as well as the Civil Aviation Safety Authority (CASA) for investigation.
Sound like the old “exploding battery” issue? It may be, though no one’s confirmed it officially, and that’s speculation on my part. Overheating or “self combusting” tends to be a problem, albeit a rare one, with lithium-based batteries. The Obama administration wants batteries classified as “hazardous material” by the U.S. government, but a House bill passed in April barred limits that exceeded international standards on shipments of lithium cells and batteries. The bill saves companies like Apple, Panasonic and Samsung piles of money (some estimates put the figure at “billions”) in safety-related costs.
But let’s not make the mistake of reading this as portent of exploding iPhones to come. Apple’s been selling iPhones for how long? That, and the number in circulation’s supposed to top 100 million by the close of this year, each one sporting a lithium-based battery, to say nothing of all the other devices in the world using lithium-based batteries (including the MacBook Air I’m typing this on). Assuming the issue on the Rex flight was battery-related, you’re talking about a clear mathematical anomaly, and while it’ll behoove us to understand what happened and why it happened, there’s little reason to worry that your lithium-based battery is next.
Cargo-based transport, where lithium-based batteries are often stored in transit from manufacturing to retail and have the potential to impact adjacent batteries or other goods are one thing–we have reason to believe a the crash of a UPS Boeing 747 in Dubai last September was caused by a lithium-based battery fire, for instance. That’s serious business, as is the thought of a lithium-based product becoming an incendiary device while it’s in your purse, your pocket, or your house while you’re away. We need to know what about the technology can cause it to behave in completely unpredictable ways. How anomalous is it really, and how much of it is design-related (the product the battery’s in), operator-related (how it’s used or stored), or innate to the technology itself.

The Great Tablet Debate: Fads or Here to Stay?



What is a tablet and who needs one anyway? Are tablets a fad and will they soon fade into irrelevance like Netbooks? Will tablets replace traditional PCs? Is there a tablet market or just an iPad market? I hear there and other questions raised from industry executives as well as many in the media on a regular basis. There are a range of opinions all over the place on this great tablet debate and I hope to add some perspective to the conversation below.
This Market is Very Early
My firm’s analysis of the market suggests that the overall tablet industry is growing at a rapid pace. We estimate just over 50 million tablets will be sold in calendar 2011 and around 100 million in 2012. We, at Creative Strategies, Inc., believe that the majority of those will be iPads and there are some key reasons why.
The first can be attributed to the early market momentum of the iPad. When we look historically at how products get adopted, history generally favors the market leader. As products mature and consumers are experiencing ownership with a new product category, they generally go with the safe bet, and right now that’s the iPad. The iPad is by far the best general purpose tablet on the market and at the moment it commands the most consumer mindshare when considering a tablet purchase.
However, the tablet is a maturing category. This is a very important point to understand. Although technology products overall are being adopted more rapidly in mature markets, the products themselves still go through their own maturity process.  Tablets are no exception, which is why many consumers will look back at these early days and think of the iPad as the first tablet computer.
But a new wrinkle in the debate that’s come to light recently relates to the Amazon Kindle Fire and Barnes & Noble Nook Tablet. Both of these products have been reviewed in view of the iPad, which is the wrong approach. In reality, the Kindle Fire and Nook Tablets are interesting to the market because they’re not trying to compete with the iPad. Rather, both take a more specific use case approach. What I mean by this, is that the Fire and Nook Tablet were built with things like e-reading, and content consumption in mind.
The root of this understanding comes from one of the best technology industry books ever written by Clayton Christensen called “The Innovator’s Dilemma.” In this book, Professor Christensen brilliantly explains how consumers “hire” products to get jobs done. That job can be writing, reading, producing, creating, etc., but the point is that there are tasks and jobs to be done that products fulfill. The Kindle Fire and Nook Tablet were built for specific jobs, whereas the iPad was built to be more general purpose, similar to a PC.
As this market matures and the tablet category evolves, consumers will refine for themselves which jobs a tablet fulfills. In that process the role of the tablet in consumers’ lives will flesh itself out. I don’t believe tablets are a fad and will find a very important role in the life of the global consumer.

Apple's iOS 5.1 Beta Code Hints At Possible Sprint iPad, iPhone 5 And Other Yet-To-Be-Released Gadgets



On Monday Apple released iOS 5.1 to developers; this is good news for iPhone owners, as it means the general release of iOS 5.1, which should once and for all fix the battery drain problems, is coming soon. But Apple fans may have more than just a software upgrade to look forward to.
Apple blog 9to5Mac found a few interesting goodies in the code of iOS 5.1, namely references to a new iPad, iPhone and Apple TV.
First, the iPad: Last week the rumor mill churned up references to j1 and j2 iPads, internal code names for tablets in development (not necessarily products that will be released). In the iOS 5.1 code,9to5Mac found a reference to an iPad 2,4, which the blog interprets as an upgrade to the current iPad 2 -- most likely a new iPad for Sprint with 4G WiMAX capability. The blog also found a reference to iPad 3,3, which might be the iPad 3, rumored for a March release with double the screen resolution of the current iPad.
Next, the iPhone: Yes, we've all heard a lot about the mythical iPhone 5, with the slimmer body, larger display screen and 4G capability. It was supposedly coming out in October, and many were disappointed when only the iPhone 4S was announced. No matter: Software developer Filippo Bigarella located a reference to the iPhone 5,1 in the iOS 5,1 code. Let the rampant speculation begin anew (as though it hadn't already, with rumors of 4G and 4-inch display screens already proliferating).
Finally, Apple TV: No, not the magical television set, or iTV, that Apple supposedly has planned for some time in 2012 or 2013, but the little black box that hooks your TV up to the Internet. A new one has been rumored to be coming in previous Apple rumors, and 9to5Mac pulled a reference to an upcoming update out of their magic code-searching hat.
A busy day for 9to5Mac writers!
These discoveries don't bring with them much new information, aside from the possibility of a wholly new iPad 2 for Sprint that would take advantage of their faster 4G WiMAX network. Otherwise, these are continued signs that Apple is working on new products: A new iPad 3 (most likely for March), a new iPhone 5 (for either the summer or October 2012) and a new Apple TV (rumored for this December or early 2012). This week in Apple rumors is heating up, and it is only Tuesday as of publication.

The 25 Most Popular (and Worst) Passwords of 2011



Here’s a pro tip: If your password is “password,” it’s probably time to change it.
SplashData, a company that offers a “complete password management and security solution,” culled from data stolen and posted online by hackers some of the most awesomely bad (and yet commonly used) passwords of all time. And while the research is for 2011, this isn’t the first such list–if you’ve seen one of these before, you’ll probably notice several culprits reappearing from years past.
The 25 most popular passwords in SplashData’s 2011 list:
  1. password
  2. 123456
  3. 12345678
  4. qwerty
  5. abc123
  6. monkey
  7. 1234567
  8. letmein
  9. trustno1
  10. dragon
  11. baseball
  12. 111111
  13. iloveyou
  14. master
  15. sunshine
  16. ashley
  17. bailey
  18. passw0rd
  19. shadow
  20. 123123
  21. 654321
  22. superman
  23. qazwsx
  24. michael
  25. Football
Let’s go over what makes a good password again: You’ll want to include different types of characters, numbers and special characters in conjunction with each other. The longer your magic passphrase is, the better. Separate words with spaces if possible (underscores work, too). And while this ought to be a no-brainer, don’t use the same password for everything.

Google’s iPad App: Almost Chrome, and Trouble for Apple



Google has earned a reputation of late for releasing troubled iOS apps. Gmail was so buggy in its initial state that Google had to pull it from the App Store. Google+ was temperamental too, and even now it lags behind its Android counterpart in getting new features. After the launch of iOS 5, Google had to pull its Voice app for a week due to crashes.
So when Google releases a beautiful, flawless iOS app like Google Search for iPad, I figure the company is up to something.
Despite the name, Google Search does more than spit back search results. The app presents you with big, colorful links to several Google services, including Gmail, Calendar, Docs, Google+, Picasa, YouTube and Google Books. These are apps within the app, sliding onto the screen in a self-contained web browser. You can also search by voice within the app, and get instant search results as you type.
As is, I can see myself spending a lot of time in Google’s iPad app, but what’s frustrating is that with a few tweaks, Google Search could be a proper iPad web browser, and probably the best one. All it needs is a full URL bar instead of a search box at the top of the screen, some bookmarks and a way to open multiple browser tabs. The groundwork for a clean, snappy interface with useful search tools is already in place. Add some more features, and suddenly it’s Chrome for iPad.
And that’s where things could get really crazy–as in, Google creating its own competing app platform within iOS.
I’m not the only one to suspect a secret plot in Mountain View. Over at The Next Web, Matt Panzarino argues that this app is Google’s way of sneaking its own web-based operating system, known as Chrome OS, onto the iPad. He figures that Google could update the app over time, replacing each web app with native software, and he suspects that Google’s Chrome OS team is behind the whole thing.
I think Panzarino has it backwards. Instead of tying in more native apps, Google should be adding more web apps, not only from its own services, but from the Chrome Web Store. By working with third-party developers to make their web apps touch-friendly, Google could build up a tablet app catalog that works in its own iPad browser.
Some of the work is already done. Try accessing NPR’s Chrome web app from an iPad. It looks almost exactly like the native App Store version–it responds to finger swipes and it plays audio within the browser. Other apps are part way there. Vimeo Couch Mode, for instance, has the interface in place, but uses Flash for video instead of the iPad-friendly HTML5. (Vimeo’s main site uses HTML5 when accessed on an iPhone or iPad.)

Monday 28 November 2011

Droid 4 Launching Already? Here’s Why



Motorola and Verizon Wireless are reportedly about to release the Droid 4, less than five months after the launch of its predecessor.
The rumor comes from Droid Life, which posted some convincing leaked product shots and a chart that compares the Droid 4 with the Droid 3 and Droid Razr.
Should this report prove accurate, the Droid 4 will look a lot like the Droid Razr, but with a slide-out keyboard tacked on. It’ll include a slightly faster processor than the Droid 3 (1.2 GHz dual-core instead of 1 GHz dual-core), a bigger battery, an HD front-facing camera and support for Verizon’s 4G LTE network. The Droid Razr’s “Smart Actions,” which improve battery life by turning certain features on and off automatically, are also along for the ride in the Droid 4, and so is support for Motorola’s Webtop docks.
Other specs that are the same as the Droid 3 include a 4-inch qHD display and an 8-megapixel rear-facing camera. Both phones run Android 2.3, according to Droid Life’s leaked spec sheet.
If not for the 4G LTE support, Verizon wouldn’t have much justification for selling a Droid 4 this holiday season. The reported spec boosts over the Droid 3 are minor, and the software experience should be pretty similar. But Verizon is really pushing 4G in its high-end smartphones, and the carrier probably doesn’t want to go through the holidays without a flagship phone that has a hardware keyboard.
Will Droid 3 buyers squeal with rage if the Droid 4 launches on December 8, as rumored? Sure, but better Android phones are always right around the corner, and when the Droid 3 launched this summer, it was no secret that 4G phones were on the way. That’s just the way it goes.